Category: Food Industry (Page 3 of 6)

American Grains Are Contaminated with Glyphosate Herbicide

Glyphosate, the most common active ingredient in herbicides world-wide, has been linked to various health problems, from gluten intolerance to autism, and most recently cancer. It is well-known that herbicides with glyphosate are sprayed on genetically modified crops that have been engineered to withstand the herbicide without killing the plant. Those wishing to avoid ingesting glyphosate were told to just avoid GMO foods. However, it is less well-known that glyphosate is also applied to non-GMO crops, specifically grains such as wheat and oats. It allows the farmers to harvest these crops much quicker.

As this article from Ken Roseboro at Ecowatch reports, it is now nearly impossible to eat products made from these grains without ingesting glyphosate.

In addition, an investigation by Healthy Traditions in late 2014 showed that even USDA certified organic grains were also contaminated with glyphosate. Residue amounts of the herbicide are actually allowed by USDA organic standards.

Why Is Glyphosate Sprayed on Crops Right Before Harvest? Glyphosate, the main ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, is recognized as the world’s most widely used weed killer. What is not so well known is that farmers also use glyphosate on crops such as wheat, oats, edible beans and other crops right before harvest, raising concerns that the herbicide could get into food products.

Glyphosate has come under increased scrutiny in the past year. Last year the World Health Organization’s cancer group, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, classified it as a probable carcinogen. The state of California has also moved to classify the herbicide as a probable carcinogen. A growing body of research is documenting health concerns of glyphosate as an endocrine disruptor and that it kills beneficial gut bacteria, damages the DNA in human embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells and is linked to birth defects and reproductive problems in laboratory animals.

A published paper describes the escalating use of glyphosate: 18.9 billion pounds have been used globally since its introduction in 1974, making it the most widely and heavily applied weed-killer in the history of chemical agriculture. Significantly, 74 percent of all glyphosate sprayed on crops since the mid-1970s was applied in just the last 10 years, as cultivation of GMO corn and soybeans expanded in the U.S. and globally.

Charles Benbrook, Ph.D., who published the paper on the mounting use of glyphosate, says the practice of spraying glyphosate on wheat prior to harvest, known as desiccating, began in Scotland in the 1980s.

“Farmers there often had trouble getting wheat and barley to dry evenly so they can start harvesting. So they came up with the idea to kill the crop (with glyphosate) one to two weeks before harvest to accelerate the drying down of the grain,” he said.

The pre-harvest use of glyphosate allows farmers to harvest crops as much as two weeks earlier than they normally would, an advantage in northern, colder regions.

The practice spread to wheat-growing areas of North America such as the upper Midwestern U.S. and Canadian provinces such as Saskatchewan and Manitoba.

Joel Ransom, an agronomist at North Dakota State University, … says desiccating wheat with glyphosate has been a useful tool for farmers.

“It does help hasten dry down and controls grain weeds and other material that slows down the threshing practice,” he said. “It has an important role in areas where it’s wet.”

Ransom says the practice has increased in North Dakota, which is the leading wheat-producing state in the U.S., over the past 15 years due to wetter weather.

While more common in Upper Midwestern states where there is more moisture, desiccation is less likely to be done in drier wheat growing areas of Kansas, Oklahoma, Washington and Oregon.

According to a wheat farmer in Saskatchewan, desiccating wheat with glyphosate is commonplace in his region. “I think every non-organic farmer in Saskatchewan uses glyphosate on most of their wheat acres every year,” the farmer speaking on condition of anonymity said.

According to Tom Ehrhardt, co-owner of Minnesota-based Albert Lea Seeds, sourcing grains not desiccated with glyphosate prior to harvest is a challenge.

“I have talked with millers of conventionally produced grain and they all agree it’s very difficult to source oats, wheat, flax and triticale, which have not been sprayed with glyphosate prior to harvest,” he said. “It’s a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell policy’ in the industry.”

Ehrhardt also says that crops grown to produce seed are not usually sprayed with glyphosate prior to harvest because this can damage seed germination.

Grain Millers, which has grain processing facilities in the U.S. and Canada, announced last year that it would not buy oats from Canada that had been desiccated with glyphosate.

“We are told these (glyphosate residues) are too small to matter but can we believe that?” the Saskatchewan farmer asked. “I think everyone, even farmers that use and love glyphosate, would rather not eat a loaf of bread with glyphosate in it.”

Wiebe shares similar concerns. “Consumers don’t realize when they buy wheat products like flour, cookies and bread they are getting glyphosate residues in those products,” he said. “It’s barbaric to put glyphosate in food a few days before you harvest it.”

Wiebe believes the use of glyphosate on wheat may be connected to the rise in celiac disease. “We’ve seen an explosion of gluten intolerance,” he said. “What’s really going on?”

“Can you imagine the public’s response if they knew that glyphosate is being sprayed on the oats in their Cheerios only weeks before it is manufactured?” Ehrhardt asked.

Read the full article at EcoWatch.com            

𝐷𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑎♡

 

Click to enlarge

The Real Cost of Cheap Food

Growing up in the 50’s and 60’s afforded us the opportunity to eat food that was not processed. For the most part, it was free of most chemicals, pesticides, herbicides and genetic modification. Most food was purchased locally.

We weren’t at the doctor’s office unless we had something major going on and those events were not commonplace. Allergies were not common and in fact, peanut and gluten allergies were unheard of. If a neighborhood kid got the measles or mumps or chicken pocks, we had parties. No sense suffering with these viruses alone. Everyone got them at the same time and then it was over AND we were inoculated against future outbreaks all at the same time. It was a win win for everyone. We spent more on our food back then and we also spent less on medical issues and insurance. Overall, we were pretty healthy.

As time went on, food got cheaper and cheaper and we have gotten sicker and sicker. Is anyone paying attention? I can tell you as a retired health coach, I am and so is Don, my beloved husband and partner in this journey. It is all about education. Let’s dig a little deeper so I can explain what the real cost of cheap food is. Let’s take a look at where we are health wise and evaluate the effectiveness of our food intake against our overall health.

While these statistics are a few years old, the story they tell is the same and it is getting worse. 70 years ago, we spent twice as much on food. Using the latest data from the USDA’s long-time tracking of food expenditures, the information has been charted going back just over six decades. The trend is obvious. Out of our total disposable income, Americans are spending a much smaller share on food today.

The data is split into two categories: food consumed ‘away from home’ & ‘at home’. Each gives us insights into how times have changed. While food prices as a whole have dropped, the country is now eating out far more often (with the most notable rise during the ‘70s fast-food boom). Even still, eating out is cheaper today than it was in the past.

Just the opposite is true for health care expenses & insurance. The seven decades since 1950 have shown an extraordinary increase in health care expenditures. The U.S. health care’s share of the GDP quadrupled from 4.6% in 1950 to more than 17% in 2009; in most peer countries, the share is 9 to 11%.

In one report I found, the United States spent the most on health care per person — $9,237 – according to two new papers published in the journal The Lancet. Somalia spent the least – just $33 per person. The data covering 184 countries was collected and analyzed by the Global Burden of Disease Health Financing Collaborator Network, a network of investigators from around the world with expertise in various aspects of health care. And the numbers keep rising. Look at the chart that I found showing data for 2017.

Click to Enlarge

As expected, wealthy countries spend more on healthcare than do poor countries. Overall, where does the money come from? Low-income countries spend the least on health, & the sources of that little bit of funding are from international donors & people paying out of pocket. In middle-income countries, people still pay out of pocket, but the government is paying for some health care. In high-income countries, the money comes mostly from government and private insurance.

When paying out of pocket, the poorest people don’t get treatment — or they’ll have treatment only to be thrown into poverty because of medical costs. That’s mostly a problem for poor countries, though the U.S. stands out among high-income countries as having catastrophic medical expenditures that put people into poverty.

You’d think that with all of the increased spending & medical breakthroughs that take place, health outcomes would generally improve, but that isn’t the case. Just compare the U.S. and the U.K. Both are high-income, highly developed countries. The U.K. spends less per person ($3,749) on health care than the U.S. ($9,237). Despite its high spending, the U.S. does not have the best health outcomes. Life expectancy is 79.1 years in the U.S. and 80.9 years in the U.K. AND while the U.S. spends more on health care than any country in the world, it ranks 12th in life expectancy among the 12 wealthiest industrialized countries. This is last place! This is according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, a non-profit organization focusing on health issues. Here is the link if you want to read more….. What Country Spends The Most (And Least) On Health Care Per Person? OR How does health spending in the U.S. compare to other countries?

Why am I telling you all of this? Because I realized, through my journey, that the more we consume poor quality, cheap food, the sicker we get in spite of the fact that we spend so much on trying to stay healthy or fight disease. Don & I felt that it was time to do something. Our lives, the lives of our family members and the future of our country and our planet are at stake.

We opened Soups On Main, in Hackettstown, NJ, as the culmination of our desire to help our community to thrive. In addition to trying to educate the public, we wanted to offer a solution to the epidemic of poor-quality food. Families are strapped for time now more than ever. Juggling parenthood responsibilities while providing food and shelter for their families is no easy feat. The stress of covering added expenses for insurance, health care, automobiles, education, fun time activities, etc., leaves little time for working parents to spend in the kitchen.

Cooking takes time. Shopping for food and cleaning up afterwards is also time consuming. Unfortunately for many, these tasks which are so vital to our health, have been left to the demise of the “big food industry”. Unfortunately, the “big food industry” is also married to the “big pharma industry” and they are in bed with the “big insurance industry”. And guess what? There is no money in health. The healthier you are, the less money “big companies” make. Big bucks and big profits are made from the processed food, pharmaceutical and insurance business sector. Because these three avenues of commerce are jointly owned by the few at the very top, they can afford to rob Peter to pay Paul. They can afford to make cheap garbage food at the expense of your health and our environment because they will make up the lost food profits on the medical side of the equation. For them it’s a win win situation.

Instead of pointing fingers and verbally complaining about the challenges we face today, Don and I decided to do something about it. We wanted to offer people an alternative to the typical “fast food” of today. But we too face challenges. One challenge is to change the “cheap food” mentality which is so common from people living in the United States today. People are used to large portions of food dished out at cheap prices. They are used to being able to buy processed food, ready to go, for pennies on the dollar. Big food manufacturers want you to keep coming back for more. They’ve engineered the food to be highly addictive, filled with salt, sugar and unhealthy fats.

If people would stop to consider what it took to get food to their dinner plate, they might realize it is humanly impossible to provide nutritious food at cheap prices. People might start to realize what the true cost of that cheap food really is from the standpoint of their health. And how about the health & welfare of the people that are helping to bring food to our table? How about the health and quality of life of the animals being raised to feed us? How about the cost to our planet from the chemicals and poisons that are incorporated into the growing of cheap crops? And more than that is the cost that we really pay when we start to experience ill health because of the lack of nutrition and the chemicals present in these cheap foods? Don’t believe me. Here are some links to documentaries and films that are bringing these abuses and atrocities to light:

This is just a small sampling of the information that is available that will tell us the truth about what is happening to our health, our food, our environment, our planet.

Questions? Feel free to email me at

do********@pr********.com











. Together we can and will make a difference in the lives of those living in our community and surrounding locales.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Protected by CleanTalk Anti-Spam