Author: Donna Appel (Page 19 of 23)

Surviving in the Aluminum Age

APRIL 24, 2019 BY CHRISTOPHER EXLEY, PHD, FRSB

 

We are living in the Aluminum Age.1 In our school lessons on human history, we learned all about the Iron Age and the Bronze Age, but will school­children in the future be taught about the Aluminum Age? I use this term to describe the period from the late nine­teenth century—when we discovered how to make alumi­num metal and its salts cheaply and efficiently—until the present day, when myriad aluminum-containing products pervade every aspect of our lives.

 

The advent of the Aluminum Age heralded the modern world we know today. Aluminum is a feature of our food, our drinks, our medicines, our cosmetics and our environment. So, in a “Gordon Gekko” sort of way, we might say that aluminum (like greed) is good! However, our expectation with all “good things,” including those containing aluminum, is that they also be safe—at least, as they say, when exposed “in moderation.”

 

We have been brought up to believe in au­thority and to respect the opinions of experts and expert committees. In turn, we expect learned bodies and societies to be committed to our well-being. All of these values may be evident for other facets of modern life, but they do not apply to, nor have they been applied to, human exposure to aluminum.2 Many will be incredu­lous to learn that in the Aluminum Age, there are no health-based standards or regulations relating to human exposure to aluminum. Nor are there laws protecting us from aluminum in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, the cosmetics we use, the medicines we need, the supplements we take or—I could go on. Aluminum is everywhere, and the result of living in the Aluminum Age is that every one of the cells that make up our body includes at least a few atoms of aluminum.

 

BODY BURDEN   Why should we be concerned that we are ac­cumulating aluminum in our bodies as we age? The answer is that while the aluminum industry has long perpetuated the myth that aluminum is benign, nontoxic and even safe, nothing could be further from the truth.

 

In fact, there are few more biologically re­active metals than aluminum. The biologically reactive form of aluminum is its free metal ion, known as Al”3+(aq). Aluminum is bound strongly by oxygen-based functional groups in biochem­istry; one example would be the phosphate groups in ATP—the energy currency of our body. Essentially, aluminum (as Al”3+(aq)) is so reactive that we expend energy simply coping with its presence in our body. If there wasn’t any aluminum in our body, all of us would have so much more natural energy.

 

ALUMINUM AND THE BRAIN   If feeling a little more tired than usual was the only repercussion from our body burden of aluminum, we might tolerate this state of af­fairs in exchange for all of the advantages of modernity brought about by the Aluminum Age. However, what happens to our brain cells and our neurons, which are struggling to cope with burgeoning amounts of aluminum? I have written elsewhere about neurons’ role as the longest-lived cells of the human body; with their biochemical advantages, neurons can be viewed as “an ostensibly immortal cell line” that has enabled human beings to live longer.3 Unfortunately, the lifespan of neurons also predisposes them to a lifetime accumulation of aluminum. With constant exposure to aluminum, can we tolerate the early loss (death) of this important immortal cell line?

 

When aluminum loads exceed the body’s excretory capacity, they form deposits and accumulate in tissues. In Alzheimer’s disease, alu­minum accumulates in brain tissue to an extent that the brain’s coping mechanisms begin to fail. Think of your brain aluminum burden (while you still can) as a catalyst of the aging process that is bringing about age-related and eventually catastrophic changes in brain chemistry, well ahead of what should be your normal longevity.4 At a time when we are all living longer, and some dream of living forever, it is noticeable that advancing age is not ushering in better health. We may be living lon­ger—but we are living unwell. In the Aluminum Age, it would seem all but futile to aspire to a healthy older age.

 

NUMBER-ONE THREAT   I have highlighted the role of aluminum in Alzheimer’s disease, but aluminum is everywhere throughout the body and is more than capable of contributing to most chronic diseases, including diabetes, autoimmunity, multiple sclerosis and other neurological conditions. To many, it seems fanciful to suggest that human exposure to aluminum is the number-one threat to human health in the twenty-first century, but thirty-five years of thinking about and researching aluminum at the highest level tell me otherwise.

 

ALUMINUM AND AUTISM    Ordinarily, I am somewhat of a skeptic when I am alerted to new health issues purportedly associated with human exposure to aluminum. One recent example would be aluminum and autism. While various studies suggested a link between aluminum and autism—primarily via the aluminum adjuvants in vaccines—at first, I could not easily see a biological mechanism to support such a link. We knew that the accumula­tion of aluminum in brain tissue toward a toxic threshold occurred over a period of decades, so how might this relate to autism in infants? We had to test this link. We did so by obtaining brain tissues from individuals who had died with a di­agnosis of autism. We then measured how much aluminum was in the brain and, significantly, where any aluminum was located in the brain.

 

The rest, as they say, is history. To summa­rize, we found extraordinarily high amounts of aluminum in autism brain tissue, and we made the unique observation that the aluminum was associated with a variety of inflammatory (non-neuronal) cells originating both in the brain (for example, the microglia) and outside of the brain (such as lymphocytes).6 The latter provided a mechanism to link aluminum adjuvants to the rapid accumulation of aluminum in brain tis­sue and, potentially, to autism. Our data—hard science—on aluminum and autism changed my mind; I now had to consider that aluminum could play a role in autism and that aluminum administered as adjuvants in vaccines could be a significant contributing factor.7 I am now, ap­parently, an “anti-vaxxer,” as they say—simply for following the science.

 

PRECAUTION NEEDED   The science that links human exposure to aluminum with disease is now stronger and more robust than at any other time in history. Perhaps this is why research funding for this science is now rarer than the proverbial hen’s teeth. (Do we, by chance, have industry and governments running scared of the science?) Our group is dependent upon philanthropy to continue our research. (If there are any philan­thropists reading this and interested in possibly contributing to our research, please get in touch by email [in bio].)

 

Until the epiphany comes—when all begin to agree that we have been horribly complacent about human exposure to aluminum—we need to adopt a precautionary approach in trying to protect ourselves against the potential ravages of aluminum. I do this in part by avoiding almost all processed foods and drinks, but mainly I use our most important scientific contribution to date. In brief, that contribution is that silicon is the Earth’s natural antidote to aluminum.

 

Our research includes clinical trials in­volving healthy volunteers, individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and people with multiple sclerosis.8 These trials have shown that silicon-rich mineral water facilitates the removal of aluminum from the body in the urine. You drink the mineral water, and you pee aluminum. It is that simple, and it is completely safe. Every day, I try to drink at least one liter of a silicon-rich mineral water—that is, a mineral water where the stated content of silicon (as “silica” on the bottle) is above thirty milligrams per liter (ppm).

 

Do not think of this as a one-off “detox” program, however. It is a philosophy for living in the Aluminum Age and for giving yourself the best possible protection against the toxicity of aluminum—protection that no government or other body is likely to afford you in the near future.

 

 

 

 

 

Compliments of * Soups On Main, 199 Main St, Hackettstown NJ 07840 * 908-736-6004 * SoupsOnMain.Com

‘Smart’ electric meters come to NJ, bringing fears of Big Brother

Marsha Stoltz, Staff Writer, @Marsha_Stoltz

Published 7:52 a.m. ET May 29, 2018 | Updated 11:04 a.m. ET May 29, 2018

Should your power company know — like Santa Claus — when you are sleeping, and when you are awake?  When you are away on vacation? What kind of refrigerator you have and how old it is?

 

Rockland Electric, which is installing the state’s first “smart” digital meters in Mahwah this month, says the two-way communication between the new meters & the utility will help it predict & ease power outages and better manage its power grid.

The meters have plenty of other upsides for customers: No more meter readers or estimated bills. No need to call when the power goes out. Customers can monitor their power use and get suggestions for energy-saving products and services.

But the improvements come with an array of concerns. Foremost among them is privacy. The technology, critics say, makes it possible to pinpoint when residents are home & away, & may also reveal what devices and appliances are being used.

“Even sex toys,”  said Jay Stanley, a privacy and technology expert with the American Civil Liberties Union. “Anything that gets plugged into an outlet to be recharged can be identified,” he said.

The smart meters are being rolled out at a time when there is growing concern about our devices’ ability to spy on us. Enormous amounts of data are collected via smartphones. Laptop cameras are vulnerable to hacking. And recently, an Amazon Echo device recorded a couple’s private conversation and sent it to an acquaintance of theirs.

In response to privacy concerns, the ACLU has initiated challenges to the use of smart-meter data in several states, seeking better regulation over who can access the information and under what circumstances.

Pushback in New Jersey – In New Jersey, legislation sponsored by Assemblyman Ronald Dancer of Ocean County would mandate that utilities disclose the type of data they will harvest, how it will be used and what third parties will have access to it.  “The information gathered from smart meters can also decipher what type of activities a customer is engaged in, such as watching television, using a computer, or how long someone spends cooking,” according to the text of the bill.

Additionally, the bill says, information from the meters “includes unencrypted data that can reveal when a homeowner is away from their residence for long periods of time.”

Rockland dismisses such concerns. – “Smart meters … are safe, secure and reliable encrypted devices that will provide two-way, wireless communication between Rockland Electric and its customers’ electric service,” says a company release announcing the program.  “Smart meters are designed to provide Rockland Electric customers greater convenience, choice and control over their energy use.”

The technology used to interpret energy use by the unique signals each appliance generates has the unwieldy name “nonintrusive appliance load monitoring.”

“There are … indications that they can tell what appliances you have, what types of television programs you are watching because each program has a unique light and dark pattern,” Stanley said.

Electric cars take the surveillance potential one step further, according to Kate Connizzo of the ACLU in Vermont, one of six states with more than 80 percent residential smart-meter penetration.

“Determining how much electricity was required to recharge an electric car, and extrapolating from that how far it had traveled, would seem to be a pretty simple matter,” said Connizzo. “Put all this together with such devices as automated license plate readers, surveillance cameras, facial recognition technology, and you construct a detailed record of a person’s movements and activities.”

Who sees your data? – Who should have access to data generated by smart meters is already being debated in states where their installation is more advanced.

In California, for example, where over 81 percent of customers have smart meters, a privacy law went into effect in January 2014. It prohibits companies from making a customer’s electrical or natural gas usage accessible to a third party without the customer’s permission.

“The law extends the highest level of protection to the privacy of the home,” Stanley said. “However, there is something called the third-party doctrine, which says if you give information to a third party, it is no longer protected. So the question is: How are the utility companies going to use this information and protect it?”

Rockland’s own privacy statement says they “may share information with third parties to permit them to send marketing communications or information about products & services.”  Rockland says customers can choose not to share their information by unsubscribing from their customer information list. Dancer’s bill would make such notice mandatory.

Sometimes, though, the sharing is obligatory, particularly with law enforcement armed with a subpoena. Police already issue subpoenas to power companies when investigating illicit activities in a neighborhood. By comparing energy use in a group of homes, for example, police can identify a home using high-power lights to grow marijuana in a basement.

Accuracy complaints – Beyond privacy concerns, critics have pointed to other problems with the meters, including accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the potential health effects from radio waves.

Residents of Bakersfield, California, filed a class-action suit in 2009 alleging their bills rose 300 percent once the meters were installed. Pacific Gas and Electric admitted two years later that the Landis+Gyr meters they installed malfunctioned when they got too warm.

Central Maine Power Co. had to appear before a state legislative committee in February to explain why their $200 million smart-meter system left sections of the state without power for a month after an October storm. The system failed to show the full extent of the power failures, including at schools in two towns.

Cost to consumers – Rockland projects the cost of installing smart meters throughout its service area at $16.5 million. Spokesman Michael Donovan projects the savings at $82.1 million over 20 years. Of that, $56.6 million would come from reduced staffing.

Stefanie Brand, director of the state Division of Rate Counsel, which participated in reviewing Rockland’s proposal from a consumer cost standpoint, said she still has “a lot of question whether the cost will exceed the benefits.”

“They are replacing a meter that lasts 20-40 years with one whose technology becomes obsolete,” Brand said. “We’re still paying for the old meters, plus the new meter. That adds to the cost.”

Brand said there are “other technologies that could be put on the wires that are a lot cheaper.”

“The question is: What are we getting for our money?” Brand said.

Mahwah is pilot program for NJ – According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, 47 percent of the 150 million electricity customers in the U.S. now have smart meters.

Rockland’s installation was approved by the state’s Board of Public Utilities and the Division of Rate Counsel last August. Eventually, 73,000 Rockland customers in Bergen, Passaic and Sussex counties will receive the meters in what is being termed a “study” or trial program.

“Rockland is the only company authorized to install smart meters and infrastructure in New Jersey,” said Peter Peretzman, a BPU spokesman. “The board won’t approve any other smart-meter programs until this study is completed. The program will take three years to build out, and then another one or two years of data to review.”

Installations began May 1, with an estimated 1,500 devices already installed in Mahwah. Rockland is a subsidiary of Orange & Rockland Utilities in New York, which has installed 60,000 of the meters in neighboring Rockland County.

“The smart-meter rollout has been extremely positive,” Donovan said. “Customers are anxious to receive their smart meter and start to see the benefits it provides.”

Customers who do not want the smart meters must notify Rockland Electric in writing, by using a form available on their website.

Customers who opt out of the smart-meter installation will be charged $15 a month. Those who opt out after the smart meter is installed will be charged $45 to have it removed.

 

 

 

 

 

Compliments of * Soups On Main, 199 Main St, Hackettstown NJ 07840 * 908-736-6004 * SoupsOnMain.Com

 

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2024

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑

Protected by CleanTalk Anti-Spam